TREASURY

Public Expenditure

Stephen Timms: Following the announcement that the Budget will take place on 21 March 2007, HM Treasury plans to publish "Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses 2007" on April 2007.

CULTURE MEDIA AND SPORT

Heritage Protection

David Lammy: I am today publishing a White Paper on the future of the Heritage Protection System entitled "Heritage Protection for the 21st Century".
	The paper sets out a vision of a unified and simpler heritage protection system, which will have more opportunities for public involvement and community engagement. The proposed system will be more open, accountable and transparent. It will offer all those with an interest in the historic environment a clearer record of what is protected and why; it will enable people who own or manage historic buildings and sites to have a better understanding of what features are important; it will streamline the consent procedures and create a more consultative and collaborative protection system.
	Developing this White Paper has also been a collaborative process and its content reflects the huge contribution of stakeholders and of colleagues across Government and the devolved administrations. Together we have produced what I believe are a number of much needed and practical proposals that will transform the current heritage protection system, making it simpler, more flexible, more transparent and more accountable. They will enable our historic assets to be better understood and managed, while still continuing to protect them, now and for the future.
	This is a White Paper for England and Wales with some UK-wide elements. The first part sets out legislative change and implementation arrangements for England; the second covers implementation arrangements in Wales; and the third part covers legislative change affecting the marine historic environment across the United Kingdom.
	The proposals in "Heritage Protection for the 21st Century" are based on three core principles: the need to develop a unified approach to the historic environment; maximising opportunities for inclusion and involvement; and supporting sustainable communities by putting the historic environment at the heart of an effective planning system.
	A unified approach
	The current heritage protection systems in England and Wales have different designation regimes for various aspects of the historic environment, and many decisions continue to be taken in Whitehall. As a consequence, the regime we have today is complicated and hard for the layman to understand. It can be bureaucratic and burdensome.
	We therefore propose a single system for national designation to replace the listing of buildings, scheduling of monuments and registering of parks, gardens and battlefields. Responsibility for national designation of all these assets in England will rest with English Heritage. All national designation decisions will be made on the basis of special architectural, historic or archaeological interest, and those decisions will be made easier to understand through the production of detailed selection criteria for national and local designation. World Heritage Sites will be included in the unified register and their outstanding universal value recognised.
	Inclusion and Involvement
	We recognise the need to improve the process of designating historic assets by involving the public in deciding what is protected and how. In order to do this we must have a system that is open, accessible and efficient. That is why we will create new Registers of Historic Buildings and Sites of England and Wales to replace existing lists and schedules, and introduce simpler and clearer designation records that will be available to the public online. We will also open up the system by introducing new or improved consultation and appeal processes, and ensure assets are protected when decisions are being made by introducing interim protection.
	Integration and efficiency
	Heritage protection is an integral part of the planning process and in this paper we set out our vision of how we can support sustainable communities by putting the historic environment at the heart of an effective planning system, and devolving greater responsibility to local planning authorities so they can manage the historic environment alongside other planning responsibilities.
	Alongside a single national designation system, we will join up and streamline the consent process and consult on the scope to reduce uncertainty and ensure early consideration of heritage issues through a greater role for pre-application discussion. In order to reduce application burdens and build flexibility into the system we will also introduce new statutory management agreements for more complex historic sites.
	We will underpin any new legislation with new policy guidance, and work with English Heritage to implement a new programme of training, support and capacity-building for English local authorities and local heritage organisations. We will also improve access to information about the historic environment by introducing a statutory duty for local authorities to maintain or have access to historic environment records.
	The Marine Environment
	In the 21st century, demands on the UK's marine environment, which includes some of our most important historic assets, are growing. In order to ensure that this element of our heritage is protected and managed appropriately, we will develop a UK-wide marine heritage protection system, which provides appropriate protection for assets, is simple and clear, and delivers designation decisions quickly.
	Accordingly, we will review the range of marine heritage that can be protected and increase protection for some assets; we will improve the designation regime and the information available about marine historic assets; and we will consider the scope for a new, more flexible, marine consents regime, including provision for voluntary management agreements.
	Britain's heritage is an important source of national and community identity. People recognise the importance and value of the historic environment, they are passionate about its preservation and are increasingly involved in celebrating the wealth of historic assets that surround them. The proposals in this White Paper reflect the fundamental role of the historic environment in shaping our towns, cities and landscapes and providing people and communities with a sense of identity and place.

Licence Fee Increases

Shaun Woodward: On 18 January this year, Official Report, column 933, my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport announced that, from 1 April 2007, the fee for a colour television licence would rise to £135.50 and the black and white licence fee to £45.50. I am today laying before the House the regulations necessary to bring these new fees into force.
	The regulations include a number of minor amendments to address anomalies in the existing television licence fee regulations. The amendments include provisions to ensure a digital set top box installed or used solely in conjunction with a black and white television set or a monitor that is only able to display black and white images will need only a black and white TV licence; that a digital set top box installed in such a way that it can be used for audio output only does not require a TV licence; that the Accommodation for Residential Care (ARC) concession is available to retired people aged 60 or over and disabled people in short term respite care in nursing and residential homes; and to increase the fee for the ARC licence, which has remained unchanged since 1988, from £5 to £7.50 to cover the cost of administering the concession.

DEFENCE

Gurkhas (Terms and Conditions of Service)

Derek Twigg: I am pleased to be able to announce to the House today the outcome of a wide-ranging review of Gurkha Terms and Conditions of Service, which was announced by the then Secretary of State for Defence in January 2005. This has been a very comprehensive review and as a consequence it has taken longer than was originally anticipated.
	As the House is aware, it has been the policy of successive British Governments to ensure that the terms and conditions under which Gurkhas serve in the British Army remain fair and reflect the needs of Gurkha soldiers and their families. The Gurkhas became a UK-based Brigade on 1 July 1997 and the time is now right for their terms and conditions of service to be revised fully to reflect their role and status in the 21st century.
	As a result of this review I am pleased to announce that, with certain exceptions designed to satisfy the Government of Nepal, all the remaining differences between Gurkhas' terms and conditions of service and those of their British counterparts are to be eliminated. I am making arrangements necessary to ensure that members of the British Brigade of Gurkhas retain their distinctive identity and ethos as Nepalese citizens serving in their own units within the British Army.
	The measures necessary to implement the new terms and conditions of service will begin to take effect from April 2007. In the particular case of pensions, we propose to give serving Gurkhas the opportunity to transfer from their current Gurkha pension scheme to one of the two armed forces pension schemes (AFPS), from a planned member transfer date of 1 October 2007. Retired Gurkhas who left service on or after 1 July 1997 will also be given the opportunity to access AFPS benefits.
	This is good news, both for serving or recently retired Gurkhas and their families and for the British Army. The move to new and fairer terms and conditions of service will hopefully provide the basis for the foreseeable future of Gurkha service in the British Army, which is only made possible by the long-standing and friendly relations between the Governments and peoples of the United Kingdom and Nepal.
	The review did not include consideration of the situation of Gurkha veterans who retired before 1 July 1997, for the reasons which my predecessor made clear to the House last summer. We will continue to respond to veterans' grievances with a view to resolving any misunderstandings which may have arisen.
	A copy of the report of the review of Gurkha terms and conditions of service, which has been redacted so as not to disclose privileged legal advice, will be made available in the Library of the House.

HEALTH

Seasonal Influenza Immunisation Programme

Patricia Hewitt: On 22 November 2005, I announced in the House of Commons that a review of the arrangements currently in place for the seasonal influenza programme in England would be carried out. This review has now been completed and published today. A copy of the review has been placed in the Library.
	The review details the current seasonal influenza vaccine supply system in England and provides a range of recommendations to strengthen the management of the programme. I welcome the report and commend the reviewers for such a thorough piece of work. The Department will be considering the detailed recommendations.
	I would also like to provide details of this year's seasonal influenza vaccination uptake. Despite reported delays to the distribution of influenza vaccine at the start of the programme, by the middle of December 14.6 million doses of vaccine had been distributed in the UK. This is about 900,000 doses more than in the previous year.
	Final vaccine uptake data collected by the Health Protection Agency on behalf of the Department at the end of January 2007 show that vaccine uptake in those aged 65 and over was 74 per cent. comparable to the level of 75 per cent. achieved at the same time last year. This compares with the World Health Organisation target of 75 per cent. by 2010. Vaccine uptake in those under 65 in an at-risk group was 42 per cent. compared to 48 per cent. at the same time last year.
	These levels of vaccination represent an excellent achievement by the general practitioners, nurses, health service providers and primary care organisations that deliver this service, especially when taking into consideration the fact that vaccine deliveries were delayed by several weeks.

HOME DEPARTMENT

Firearms (Police Use)

Tony McNulty: The statistics for 1 April 2005 to 31 March 2006 show that the number of police operations in which firearms were authorised was 18,891.
	The police discharged a conventional firearm in nine incidents. In addition, the Police discharged baton rounds or AEP in 14 incidents and fired Taser in 89 incidents.
	Armed response vehicles were deployed on 14,355 occasions and there were 6,584 authorised firearms officers in England and Wales.
	Full details are set out in the following tables:
	
		
			 Number of operations in which firearms were authorised 
			  2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 
			 Total 13,991 14,827 16,657 15,981 18,891 
			 Avon and Somerset 195 262 311 333 247 
			 Bedfordshire 237 301 442 475 575 
			 Cambridgeshire 114 57 104 241 201 
			 Cheshire 419 451 397 358 367 
			 Cleveland 37 170 453 530 657 
			 City of London 40 131 364 404 323 
			 Cumbria 71 77 72 152 112 
			 Derbyshire 275 401 369 287 305 
			 Devon and Cornwall 101 96 112 71 84 
			 Dorset 184 193 231 223 263 
			 Durham 89 83 156 144 291 
			 Essex 323 312 275 296 432 
			 Gloucestershire 165 185 127 176 229 
			 Greater Manchester 580 518 507 461 478 
			 Hampshire 198 162 208 237 289 
			 Hertfordshire 112 172 195 185 187 
			 Humberside 297 187 183 206 362 
			 Kent 115 137 207 163 219 
			 Lancashire 232 238 318 241 240 
			 Leicestershire 300 268 295 260 363 
			 Lincolnshire 477 392 386 294 220 
			 Merseyside 1,020 628 751 733 669 
			 Metropolitan 2,447 3,199 3,563 2,964 4,711 
			 Norfolk 175 200 178 195 175 
			 Northamptonshire 43 138 148 158 137 
			 Northumbria 1,440 1,275 1,140 977 611 
			 North Yorkshire 92 100 147 185 183 
			 Nottinghamshire 384 452 459 408 394 
			 South Yorkshire 258 463 484 546 749 
			 Staffordshire 232 281 255 216 171 
			 Suffolk 163 270 251 153 202 
			 Surrey 245 247' 203 151 222 
			 Sussex 248 204 280 187 190 
			 Thames Valley 179 167 195 289 427 
			 Warwickshire 130 149 164 124 180 
			 West Mercia 117 91 197 162 122 
			 West Midlands 822 902 1,377 1,264 1,044 
			 West Yorkshire 757 604 575 853 1,335 
			 Wiltshire 45 58 63 88 139 
			 Dyfed Powys 28 29 28 51 63 
			 Gwent 20 37 40 81 94 
			 North Wales 302 259 197 223 350 
			 South Wales 283 281 250 236 279 
		
	
	
		
			 Number of authorised firearms officers (AFOs) 
			  2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 
			 Total 5,776 5,763 6,96 6,243 6,584 
			 Avon and Somerset 116 84 122 118 117 
			 Bedfordshire 48 53 58 56 59 
			 Cambridgeshire 56 71 60 60 50 
			 Cheshire 81 89 75 76 73 
			 Cleveland 85 80 95 100 100 
			 City of London 73 72 86 89 86 
			 Cumbria 92 87 89 90 89 
			 Derbyshire 80 69 70 74 75 
			 Devon and Cornwall 108 115 132 123 122 
			 Dorset 57 59 60 64 62 
			 Durham 86 102 97 103 100 
			 Essex 180 184 186 202 205 
			 Gloucestershire 71 80 82 93 92 
			 Greater Manchester 219 202 205 187 245 
			 Hampshire 87 94 94 92 97 
			 Hertfordshire 46 47 50 53 52 
			 Humberside 96 96 96 101 92 
			 Kent 113 93 90 94 94 
			 Lancashire 138 129 122 115 123 
			 Leicestershire 69 68 51 53 59 
			 Lincolnshire 91 87 78 86 87 
			 Merseyside 78 84 94 93 129 
			 Metropolitan 1,805 1,823 2,060 2,134 2,331 
			 Norfolk 104 109 114 125 119 
			 Northamptonshire 51 56 52 50 56 
			 Northumbria 125 99 90 93 98 
			 North Yorkshire 66 64 60 56 78 
			 Nottinghamshire 136 131 138 138 149 
			 South Yorkshire 92 100 98 122 116 
			 Staffordshire 71 63 67 76 70 
			 Suffolk 90 80 96 88 84 
			 Surrey 62 48 53 49 51 
			 Sussex 120 141 134 130 129 
			 Thames Valley 156 180 172 176 180 
			 Warwickshire 50 51 46 53 55 
			 West Mercia 125 131 139 141 152 
			 West Midlands 111 110 124 134 145 
			 West Yorkshire 116 132 140 130 150 
			 Wiltshire 71 78 80 74 72 
			 Dyfed Powys 77 62 58 79 68 
			 Gwent 57 60 71 74 86 
			 North Wales 83 75 73 65 57 
			 South Wales 138 125 139 134 130 
		
	
	
		
			 Number of operations involving armed response vehicles (ARVs) 
			  2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 
			 Total 11,574 11,848 13,218 13,137 14,355 
			 Avon and Somerset 173 215 249 312 167 
			 Bedfordshire 172 269 414 419 534 
			 Cambridgeshire 43 45 155 172 160 
			 Cheshire 523 337 356 773 807 
			 Cleveland 13 63 86 154 285 
			 City of London 39 131 364 275 234 
			 Cumbria 53 45 65 134 90 
			 Derbyshire 253 363 312 254 257 
			 Devon and Cornwall 76 32 94 54 54 
			 Dorset 182 180 215 195 246 
			 Durham 57 66 96 91 256 
			 Essex 165 176 138 138 155 
			 Gloucestershire 140 166 109 121 145 
			 Greater Manchester 528 406 440 364 306 
			 Hampshire 116 108 128 167 178 
			 Hertfordshire 81 129 157 155 160 
			 Humberside 273 170 158 184 335 
			 Kent 89 132 193 124 183 
			 Lancashire 192 185 273 228 232 
			 Leicestershire 292 232 269 232 328 
			 Lincolnshire 470 367 355 276 210 
			 Merseyside 974 547 687 677 611 
			 Metropolitan 1,667 2,447 2,423 2,322 2,572 
			 Norfolk 157 186 169 163 149 
			 Northamptonshire 25 90 99 89 101 
			 Northumbria 1,49 1,04 1,063 893 585 
			 North Yorkshire 60 67 110 144 208 
			 Nottinghamshire 333 397 404 336 342 
			 South Yorkshire 221 280 322 438 632 
			 Staffordshire 208 241 212 183 154 
			 Suffolk 116 160 194 119 149 
			 Surrey 225 240 190 140 204 
			 Sussex 189 171 250 163 162 
			 Thames Valley 174 167 179 265 355 
			 Warwickshire 104 31 138 102 144 
			 West Mercia 100 111 241 152 94 
			 West Midlands 563 592 975 952 745 
			 West Yorkshire 609 565 543 656 1040 
			 Wiltshire 43 39 28 54 124 
			 Dyfed Powys 28 29 28 48 55 
			 Gwent 16 16 23 74 85 
			 North Wales 265 198 153 180 299 
			 South Wales 218 253 161 165 223

LEADER OF THE HOUSE

Gender Neutral Drafting

Jack Straw: For many years the drafting of primary legislation has relied on section 6 of the Interpretation Act 1978, under which words referring to the masculine gender include the feminine. In practice this means that male pronouns are used on their own in contexts where a reference to women and men is intended, and also that words such as chairman are used for offices capable of being held by either gender. Many believe that this practice tends to reinforce historic gender stereotypes and presents an obstacle to clearer understanding for those unfamiliar with the convention.
	I have worked with colleagues in Government to secure agreement, that it would be right, where practicable, to avoid this practice in future and, accordingly, Parliamentary Counsel has been asked to adopt gender-neutral drafting.
	From the beginning of next Session, Government Bills will take a form which achieves gender-neutral drafting so far as it is practicable, at no more than a reasonable cost to brevity or intelligibility. This policy already applies to tax law rewrite Bills and is consistent with the practice in many other jurisdictions in the English-speaking world.
	The Government recognise that, in practice, Parliamentary Counsel will need to adopt a flexible approach to this change (for example, in at least some of the cases where existing legislation originally drafted in the former style is being amended).
	I am grateful to my hon. Friend the Under-Secretary of State, Department for Communities and Local Government, the hon. Member for Sheffield, Heeley (Meg Munn) for raising this matter with me.

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

EU Development Ministers (Informal Meeting)

Hilary Benn: I shall be representing the UK at the EU Development Ministers' informal meeting in Bonn on 12-13 March 2007.
	The agenda items are as follows:
	Monday 12 March
	Over dinner Development Ministers will discuss the issues around "Investing in Africa" and "Reconstruction in the Great Lakes Region". World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz and Dr. Michael Otto (Chairman of the Board of the Otto Group and founder of the "Cotton made in Africa" initiative) will attend as guest speakers to share their experience of investing in Africa. President Joseph Kabila of the Democratic Republic of Congo and Roland van der Geer, EU Special Representative for the Great Lakes, have been invited to discuss the political, economic and social challenges presented by the reconstruction in the Great Lakes Region.
	Tuesday 13 March
	Energy and development:
	Energy and development is one of the priorities for the German EU Presidency. Discussion will be focused around Presidency paper questions on how the EU and African partners can work together on energy security and access to energy, as well as on mitigating the negative effects of climate change.
	Division of labour (Aid Effectiveness):
	This discussion follows-up agreement at the October 2006 GAERC. In their discussion paper the Presidency have asked three questions around how to start implementing the operational guidelines and how to better balance the geographical focus of EU donors' development work.
	UN Reform
	Development Ministers will discuss reform of the United Nations development institutions over lunch. UN Deputy Secretary General Asha-Rose Migiro has been invited as guest speaker for the session.
	Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs):
	Negotiations on Economic Partnership Agreements with Africa, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries are due to be completed during 2007. There will be an EU Development Ministers session on EPAs in the morning in preparation for a joint EU-ACP Ministers discussion in the afternoon. Approximately thirty ACP Ministers are expected to attend. The sessions will focus on how to ensure the Agreements are development-friendly and EPA-related support for ACP countries.

TRANSPORT

Intercity Express Programme

Douglas Alexander: My Department has today initiated the procurement of a new fleet of trains for the Intercity Express Programme (IEP) by issuing a notice to the market through the Official Journal of the European Union.
	The IEP will develop a new fleet to replace the current high speed train. This is a project that complements this summer's high level output specification, looking at the railways in the next control period, and the longer term framework for the railways. The new fleet will improve capacity and reliability and meet increasing passenger requirements. It will also deliver improved energy efficiency, reduce emissions and ensure flexibility of train deployment so that future demand and environmental requirements will be met.
	This is the most significant rolling stock programme in the UK for over 30 years. My Department has received widespread input from the rail industry and passenger groups in setting this specification. However, it will be the rail industry rather than my Department who will be designing this train.
	The Department is expecting to commission between 500 and 2,000 new vehicles, with deployment subject to costs and value. This fleet will be introduced across the network from 2014, and can expect to operate for 30 years. A "pre-series" batch of the trains will be introduced first, to test the new train in an operational environment before production of the full fleet begins. It is likely these pre-series trains will be deployed on the East Coast Main Line from 2012.
	The total cost of the programme will be dependent on the bids that my Department receives from interested parties, and the final number of vehicles purchased. I will continue to update the House on this and other information as this long-term project develops.

InterCity East Coast Franchise

Tom Harris: I am today announcing that we have issued bidders for the InterCity East Coast Mainline franchise with an Invitation to Tender (ITT). The shortlist of the four organisations who will receive an ITT was announced to the Stock Exchange on 20 February 2007.
	A copy of the Stakeholder Briefing Document, which gives a synopsis of the ITT, has been placed in the Libraries of both Houses and is available on the Department for Transport website at www.dft.gov.uk.
	My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State announced to Parliament on 18 December 2006 that we had started a competition to find an operator to run train services on the East Coast Main Line from London to the North East and Scotland. Until the conclusion of that competition, it has been agreed that ONER will continue to operate services on the Department's behalf under a temporary management contract.
	The ITT has been informed by a public consultation that closed on 15 February 2007. The objectives for the new franchise include the requirement to meet current and future passenger demand and facilitate increases in capacity.
	We have stipulated that all bidders demonstrate that they will deliver value for money for both passengers and taxpayers and improve services for current and future rail users. Bidders must provide the minimum service levels the ITT sets out and can propose additional services and enhancements, subject to any operational and affordability constraints.
	Current service levels will be maintained, with additional Leeds half-hourly services that will commence in May 2007 included. Bidders will also be required to reflect the emerging recommendations of the East Coast Route Utilisation Strategy, which will be published by Network Rail.
	We expect bidders to consider the level of rolling stock used on the franchise and how they might provide additional capacity. Bidders have been asked to price the trialling of pre-series InterCity Express Trains, which will replace the current fleet of High Speed Trains, should a fleet become operational from Summer 2012.
	Performance will be contracted to improve, and faster journey times, particularly on longer distance journeys, delivered. We expect improvements in safety, security and accessibility at stations to be put in place.
	Fares will be set in a manner consistent with current Government policy. The winner of the franchise competition will put in place an interoperable smart ticketing system across the franchise area by January 2010.